The Responsibility of Speech
“I may not approve of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
This oft-repeated phrase, commonly, though incorrectly, attributed to Voltaire, was actually written by Evelyn Beatrice Hall, an English writer. She included it in her 1906 biography The Friends of Voltaire as a summary of his views, not a direct quotation.
Many treat the statement as a definitive moral stance on free speech. It appeals to our ideals of liberty, tolerance, and civic courage. But the Philosophy of the Divine Law asks us to reconsider: Does speech deserve defense if it distorts the Truth, harms others, or undermines our shared reality?
At the heart of the Philosophy of the Divine Law is the understanding that Truth governs all. It is not invented by belief or created by our laws. It is discovered in the reality we share, observable and consistent regardless of our preferences or perspectives. In this light, the right to speak cannot be seen as separate from the responsibility to speak truthfully.
To speak is not a neutral act. Speech shapes perception, influences behavior, and constructs meaning. Some speech informs and uplifts. Other speech deceives, degrades, or destroys. The Philosophy of the Divine Law does not call for censorship, but it does demand discernment. It does not condemn disagreement, but it does reject speech that willfully obscures what is real. In this view, speech not grounded in Truth does not warrant defense based on liberty; it warrants correction based on shared responsibility.
Freedom of speech is essential to seeking and accepting Truth. It allows for the open exchange of perspectives and challenges assumptions that may obstruct understanding. But freedom divorced from responsibility becomes a weapon—one that can be wielded to spread misinformation, incite violence, or sustain harmful systems of belief. To defend speech simply because it is speech is to neglect the deeper moral question: What effect does this speech have on our shared reality?
The Philosophy of the Divine Law calls us to speak, not from belief, but from what is observable, verifiable, and just. It honors the courage to disagree, but not the cowardice of hiding behind freedom to spread harm. It upholds the right to expression—but not at the expense of Truth, dignity, or responsibility.
If speech is to be defended, it must be for more than the right to speak—it must be for the contribution it makes to Truth, or the constructive challenge it poses to our understanding. Where conventional thinking says, “All speech must be protected,” the Philosophy of the Divine Law replies, “All speech must be examined.”
Thus, the phrase “I will defend to the death your right to say it” is incomplete. The Philosophy of the Divine Law reframes it as:
“I will not silence you. However, I will not defend you if your words are not grounded in Truth.”
And in this, the Philosophy of the Divine Law offers not restriction, but clarity. Not suppression, but responsibility. Not silence, but a more truthful voice in return.
© 2025 Beyond The Ritual. All Rights Reserved.